SQ4R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, and Reflect) and Students’ Reading Attitude Toward Their Reading Comprehension

  • Jelita Jelita Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP Nurul Huda Sukaraja
Keywords: SQ4R, Students' Reading Attitude, Reading Comprehension

Abstract

The aims of the study were to find out whether or not (1) there is any significant difference in reading comprehension between the students who had positive and negative attitude in experimental class, (2) there is any significant difference in reading comprehension between the students who had positive and negative attitude in control class,(3) there is any significant difference in reading comprehension among the students who had positive attitude in control and experimental class,(4) there is any significant difference in reading comprehension between the students who had negative attitude in control and experimental class, (5) there is any interaction effect between SQ4R strategy and reading attitude in increasing reading comprehension. The population of this study was all the eleventh class students consisted of 144 students of SMA N I Buay Madang OKU Timur. The 72 sample students were taken by using stratified random sampling. In carrying out the research, the researcher used the true experimental factorial design. The writer distributed the pretest, posttest, and questionnaire on students' reading attitude (positive and negative) in collecting the data. In analyzing the data, t-test and two-way ANOVA were used. There is any significant difference between posttest and pretest in Experimental class, there is any significant difference between posttest and pretest in control class, there is significantly different on Positive Attitude students in experimental class and Positive Attitude students in control class, there is significant difference between negative Attitude students in experimental class and negative Attitude students in control class. The last, there was no any significant interaction between the students' reading attitude and strategies used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brasell,D. and Rasinski,T. (2008). Comprehension that Works Taking Students Beyond Ordinary Understanding to Deep Comprehension. Corinne burton, M.A.Ed.

Nunan, David. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Olson, J.P & M.H Diller.(1982). Learning to Teach Reading in Elementary School. London: Macmilan Publishing Company

Reinhard,pekrun,P.Hd. (2011), The students Emotion. http://www.education.com. Accessed on 06 December 2012

Richardson, J. & Morgan, R. (1997). Reading to Learn in the Content Areas. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Ricky.C.R (1989). The theoretical and conceptual based of instruction design London.

Richard & Schmidt, B.& B.G Schick. (2002). A Guide Book for The Teaching of Reading: Junior High School Through College Adult Levels. Chicago-Illinoios. Psychotechnics Press Inc.

Seitz.Rupley. (1981). Principles and Practises of Teaching Reading. 5th ed. Sydney: Charles E. Merril publishing Company

Yuliani,Sri. (2012). The Influence of Cooperative Learning Strategy and Student’s Attitude on Reading Comprehension of Fourth Grade Students of Muhammadiyah University. Unpublished Thesis. English Post Graduate. University of PGRI Plaembang

Wallace.M.J.(1998). Action Reseache for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallen, N. E., & Fraenkel, J. R. (1991). Education Research: A Guide to Process. New York: McGraw-Hill,Inc.
Published
2018-04-01
How to Cite
Jelita, J. (2018, April 1). SQ4R (Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review, and Reflect) and Students’ Reading Attitude Toward Their Reading Comprehension. Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 3(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v3i1.265

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 3 times