Transition Action Details (Tad) Strategy in Teaching Writing Recount Text

Authors

  • Siti Yulianti Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP Nurul Huda Sukaraja
  • Dwi Andriani Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP Nurul Huda Sukaraja
  • Zulaikah Zulaikah Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP Nurul Huda Sukaraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v5i1.752

Keywords:

Writing, Transition Action Details Strategy, Recount text

Abstract

This thesis is entitled "The Use of Transition Action Details Strategy in Teaching Writing Ability to the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Rawabening". The objective of this study was to know whether or not there are any significant differences between the student who are taught by using the Transition Action Details Strategy and the student who is not taught by using it. This study used an experimental method, a quasi-experimental design. The population of this study was 47 students, and the sample was 47 students was taken by using purposive sampling, those were 24 students of the experimental group and 23 students of the control group. Based on the calculation by using an independent t-test by using SPSS 16, The writer found that t-obtained was higher than t-table (2.868>2.014) at the significant level a=0.05 in two-tailed testing. It meant that there were any significant differences between the experimental group and the control group. So, the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and alternative hypotheses (Ha) were accepted. It can be concluded that Transition Actions Details Strategy was significant in teaching writing ability to the eighth-grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Rawabening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (the fourth (2000) edition).New York: Pearson Education Company.
Bumgardner, J. (2011) .http: www. The word factory.com/2011/01/20/clearer directions-better-repost-.acessed on july 28.
Crystal, D. (2003). English As A Global Language. Cambridge
Dalilan. (2010). Text Introduction to Linguistic (Course Material).Unpublished Paper.Muhammadiyah University, Palembang.
Hyland, K. (2009). Researching Writing. Hongkong: City University.
Knapp, P., Watkins, M. (2005).Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Lester, (2006). Be a Better Writer. Amerika, UK: LeverageFactory, Inc.
Manurung, C.D. (2013). Improving the Students' Achievement in Writing Recount Text by Using Transitions-Action-Details (TAD) Strategy. Medan, Indonesia.
Nui,K.M. (2013). Writing Resource Guide, Learning to Write. Honolulu :University of Hawai.
Peha, S. (2003).The Writing Teachers' Strategy Guide. New York :TTMS, inc.
Siahaan, S. (2008). The English paragraph (the first edition). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Taqi, Hanan A. et al. (2015). The Effect of Diary Writing on EFL Students’ Writing and Language Abilities.UK: British Journal of Education, III (2) 75-91. Retrieved on Saturday, February 3rd, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-01

How to Cite

Yulianti, S., Andriani, D., & Zulaikah, Z. (2020). Transition Action Details (Tad) Strategy in Teaching Writing Recount Text. Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 5(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v5i1.752
Abstract Views: 1185 | File Views: 1232

Most read articles by the same author(s)