POSSE (Predict, Organize, Search, Summarize, and Evaluate) Strategy Towards Reading Comprehension Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30599/channing.v4i2.740Keywords:
influence, reading comprehension, POSSE strategyAbstract
This research aimed at finding out whether or not Predict, Organize, Search, Summarize, and Evaluate (POSSE) Strategy influence the students’ reading comprehension achievement of the eighth-grade students of SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Karang Tengah. The population consists of 99 students. The sample was 69 students taken through purposive sampling. In this research, the researcher used multiple-choice as an instrument for collecting the data. The data obtained from Independent t-test analysis, between the result of the posttest in the experimental group and the control group. Based on the calculation by using an Independent t-test, the researcher found that t-Obt. was higher than the t-table (4,115 > 2,000) and less than at the significant level α = 0.05(0.000 < 0.05) in a two-tailed test. So, the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded that the POSSE Strategy influence to teach reading comprehension achievement.
Downloads
References
Aprilia, N. (2015). Improving reading comprehension of the eighth-grade students at SMPN 6 Yogyakarta through posse strategy in the academic year of 2014/2015 (Doctoral dissertation, Thesis (Unpublished): Faculty Of Languages And Arts State University Of Yogyakarta).
Boyle, J., & Scanlon, D. (2009). Methods and strategies for teaching students with mild disabilities: A case-based approach. Cengage Learning.
Darmayenti, D., & Kustati, M. (2017). Enhancing Islamic Students’ Reading Comprehension through Predict Organize Search Summarize Evaluate Strategy. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 24(1), 1-8.
Englert, C. S., & Mariage, T. V. (1991). Making students partners in the comprehension process: Organizing the reading “POSSE”. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14(2), 123-138.
Fraenkel, J. R. (8). Wallen., NE (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill Companies, Inc.
Freville, C. B., & Reardon, C. (2006). Supporting the Learning of Students with Disabilities: A Guide to the Use of Digitized Primary Sources.
Hasibuan, S. F. (2018). The Implementation of Trading Place Strategy to Improve the Students’ability in Reading Comprehension of Report Text at Eighth Grade Of Mts S. Al-Husna Marindal Medan Academic Year 2018/2019. In Aicll: Annual International Conference On Language And Literature (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 131-139).
Jain, P. M., & Patel, M. F. (2008). English Language Teaching:(methods, Tools & Techniques). Sunrise Publishers and Distributors.
Lopera Medina, S. (2012). Effects of strategy instruction in an EFL reading comprehension course: A case study. Profile Issues in TeachersProfessional Development, 14(1), 79-89.
PISA. (2014). PISA 2018 Result Snapshot of Students’ Performance in Reading, Mathematics, and Science. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-results_ENGLISH.png
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge university press.
Warsnak, A. D. (2006). The effects of activating prior knowledge before reading on students with and without learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, Wichita State University).
Westwood, P. S. (2008). What teachers need to know about reading and writing difficulties. Aust Council for Ed Research.
Wulansari, A., Andriani, D., & Agustina, E. (2018). Predict, Organize, Rehearse, Practice and Evaluate (PORPE) Method to Teach Students’ Reading Comprehension. Channing: Journal of English Language Education and Literature, 3(2), 100-105.