PLEASE (Pick, List, Evaluate, Activate, Supply, and End) Strategy Toward Student’s Writing Achievement on Recount Text
The thesis entitled “The Influence of Using PLEASE (Pick, List, Evaluate, Activate, Supply And End) Strategy Toward Student’s Writing Achievement on Recount Text at The Tenth Grade of SMA Pangudi Luhur Sukaraja”. The problem of this study as follows “Is there any significant differences between the students who are taught by using the PLEASE strategy and who are not taught by using the PLEASE strategy toward student’s writing achievement on recount text at the tenth grade of SMA Pangudi Luhur Sukaraja?”. In this study, the writer used a quasi-experimental design. The population in this study was the tenth-grade students of SMA Pangudi Luhur Sukaraja, with the total of the population was 64 students. Whereas, the sample of the study was 40 students were taken by using purposive sampling, those were 20 students of X IPS1 as experimental group and 20 students of X IPS2 as the control group. Moreover, the writer used a written test. The data obtained from Independent t-test analysis, between the result of the post-test in experimental class and control class. Based on the calculation by using an Independent t-test, the researcher found that tobtained was higher than ttable (6.211> 1.697) at the significance level ɑ = 0.05 in a two-tailed test. So, the Null Hypothesis (H0) was rejected and the Alternative Hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It can be concluded that there was any significant difference in teaching writing by using PLEASE Strategy in SMA Pangudi Luhur.
Megaiab, Machalla. M. A. (2014). WEI International academic conference proceedings. The first Senior High School Bali.
Eacott, S. (2007). Strategy and The School Principal. Journal of Catholic School Studies,79(2), 3-18.
Boyle, J., & Scanlon, D. (2010). Methods and strategies for teaching students with mild disabilities. Wadsworth: Cencage Learning.
Welch, M. (1992). The PLEASE strategy: A metacognitive learning strategy for improving the paragraph writing of students with mild disabilities. Learning disabilities quarterly, 15, 119–128.
Peha, S. The writing teacher’s guide. Teaching That Makes Sense, inc., 2003.p.3
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan: pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge Tailor & Francis Group.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York, NY: Mcgraw Hill Companies.